Hey. There is no such thing as a “non-sexual” kink. A fetish is clinically defined as also being “non-sexual” in the sense that the person is sexually aroused by something that’s traditionally non-sexual in their environment/culture (feet, robots, wooden tables, vore, etc).
If you’re into feet, vore, inflation, whatever, and you’re interacting with underage people with regards to your “non-sexual” kink or fetish, like rping with them or swapping art specifically because you’re engaging them with the kink/fetish aspect, you’re a piece of shit. You’re being a pedo. Stop. Fuck off.
It’s also absolutely fucked to do that to an adult because there is a lack of disclosure and consent.
If you like “vore” or whatever because you think it’s cool, scary, etc and it is truly not sexual to you, as in it won’t give you a boner, then.. don’t call it a kink. You have an ultra niche interest that’s a little weird. Trying to call a kink a “non-sexual” kink is so fucking galaxy brain. It’s embarrassing. You’re trying to have it both ways: you wanna be open about your sexuality, while also attempting to sanitize it so you can continue interacting with people, including minors, irresponsibly.
Don’t argue with idiots saying otherwise. Their mental gymnastics are Nth dimension rationalization for something that’s very straightforward.
